I am firmly of the view that, especially since the pandemic, people's digital exposure is greater than ever, with more and more of our activities, activities and transactions necessary for everyday life being "outsourced" to the online space, under the authority of the big platforms that we all know.

As a result of these processes, we spend much more time in front of screens and/or smartphones, but on the other hand, over the last decade or more, more and more of our transactions have been taking place virtually, replacing/replacing physical processes, and thus more and more of our rights and needs are being asserted digitally.

In the course of these processes, we need to reach a situation - even with significant legal aid activity - where we as individuals have real, transparent, and meaningful redress possibilities for our transactions, digital profiles, portfolios, and content on online platforms operated by large platform providers.

The European Commission's adoption of the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and Digital Services Act (DSA) Regulations in 2022 will provide a practical way to enforce these legitimate claims.

Of course, I understand the argument - especially in the case of social networking sites - that the organizer of the 'house party' sets the rules, since it is indeed a question of private companies developing products and services based on risk-taking, but it is a question of the paradigm shift in human existence referred to above, and of the rights and values declared to be protected by the European Union.

The EU sources of law cited provide the appropriate legal basis for the enforcement of the rights referred to above.

In practice, these mammoth service providers often use algorithms in an attempt to undermine the legal remedy, which is of paramount importance for legal certainty.

However, given my axiom that the 'digital exposure' of humanity, the change in our way of life, has become a general phenomenon, especially after two long years in the shadow of the pandemic, these global changes must necessarily bring with them the implementation of digital justice.

I would like to actively participate in this process, together with several of my colleagues, and on the one hand, reduce people's digital exposure and on the other hand give fresh content to legal awareness in the digital environment of the 21st century.